Polish-Jewish Relations: 1,300 Keyword-Phrase-Indexed Book Reviews (by Jan Peczkis)

Revolution in Bavaria 1918-1919: The Eisner Regime and the Soviet Republic, by Allan Mitchell. 1965. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

Jews Provoked Hitler: Bavarian Revolution and Bavarian Soviet Republic

Textbooks falsify history in a decidedly pro-Jewish direction. According to the standard narrative, Hitler just got the crazy idea that Jews stabbed Germany in the back, and dreamed up the bizarre idea that the Jews were enemies of Germany. He started picking on the Jews for no reason at all.

The stab in the back is misrepresented as solely related to the WWI Armistice, when in reality it encompassed multiple Jewish acts against Germany while she was still weakened after WWI, including the Bavarian Revolution. The dastardliness of the stab-in-the-back act is what counts, and not necessarily its magnitude. It is like kicking a man while he is down: Not whether the kick was especially injurious. Or, in criminal law, a crime is a crime, regardless of the target. But a crime against a child, handicapped person, or elderly person is recognized as bearing an aggravating circumstance, incurring a stiffer sentence owing to its dastardliness.

JEWS PROVOKED HITLER: ENTER THE (SHORT-LIVED) JEWISH-COMMUNIST RULE OVER BAVARIA

For context and background information, see:

https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2023/03/21/hitler-radicalized-did-the-local-bavarian-judeo-bolshevism-revolutionize-the-eventual-fuhrer-zydokomuna-denialism-strongly-repudiated-brenner/

https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/zbaszyn-1938-jewish-expellees-facts-bryant/

Now Mitchell writes, “The Bavarian revolution had begun as a classic example of successful intrigue by a minority in the capital city, and it remained an affair in which the revolutionary impetus was dependent on that city.” (p. 121). The “successful intrigue by a minority”–good choice of phraseology. Its potential to spread is obvious.

Kurt Eisner was born in a modestly affluent Jewish shopkeeper family. (p. 35). [So much for the myth that Communists became that way because of desperate poverty]. He adds, “As premier of the new Republic, Kurt Eisner wore several political hats in various styles.” (p. 126). This was just the beginning. Successive versions of the Communist Bavarian Republic consisted of more virulent strains of Communism–led by the Jews Ernst Toller and Eugen Levine.

JEWS PROVOKED HITLER: THE  JEWISH-COMMUNIST GRAB OF BAVARIA

The Communist Bavaria of 1918-1919 was indeed unmistakably Communist. Even Mitchell admits, “The press would be socialized along with the mines, the banks would be reorganized and so would the bureaucracy, special revolutionary tribunals would replace the courts, living quarters would be registered, foodstuffs would be confiscated, the bourgeoisie would be disarmed and proletariat armed, the Red Army formed, the Soviet Republic defended, the International greeted, the World Revolution extended.” (p. 310).

———–

So the Jews Provoked Hitler, who devoted the entire Chapter 8 of MEIN KAMPF to the temporary Jewish-Communist takeover of Bavaria (1918-1919). Because the Mitchell book on the Revolution in Bavaria is largely sanitized of the Jewish involvement behind it, I now quote from MEIN KAMPF, James Murphy 1939 English edition, which exists online as a pdf. Here is Hitler’s assessment of the Bavarian Revolution:

“The international Jew, Kurt Eisner, began to play off Bavaria against Prussia….In deliberately giving the revolutionary rising in Bavaria the character of an offensive against Prussia, Kurt Eisner was not acting in the slightest degree from the standpoint of Bavarian interests, but merely as the commissioned representative of Jewry. He exploited existing instincts and antipathies in Bavaria as a means which would help to make the dismemberment of Germany all the more easy. When once dismembered, the REICH would fall an easy prey to Bolshevism.” (ibid, p. 454).

In his Chapter 8, Hitler describes his personal combat involvement against the Communist-serving forces. It is obvious that, for Hitler, Jews and Communism were not mere abstractions, and Communism was no “Red under the bed” paranoid fantasy. For Hitler, Jews and Communism were lucid, and were up close and personal. And no wonder that Hitler saw the Jews as existential enemies out to dismember and subvert Germany. He had seen it with his own eyes and had felt it on his own skin. For the young, impressionable Corporal Hitler, this was a real lived experience.

On top of this, all this happened little more than a year after the Russian Revolution, at which time Communism and the Jewish involvement therein seemed unstoppable. Here is how Adolph Hitler assessed the Russian Revolution, which then seemed all but certain to spread to Germany:

“In Russia the moment the agitators were successful in inciting broad masses of the people, who could not read or write, against the upper layer of intellectuals who were not in contact with the masses or permanently linked with them in any way–at that moment the destiny of Russia was decided, the success of the Revolution was assured. Thereupon the analphabetic Russian became the slave of his Jewish dictators who, on their side, were shrewd enough to name their dictatorship ‘The Dictatorship of the People’.” (ibid, p. 428).