Holocaust Exceptionality Claims are Political. They Drive Victimhood Competition. All Non-Jewish Genocides Marginalized. A. Dirk Moses
Conceptual Blockages and Definitional Dilemmas in the ‘Racial Century”: Genocides of Indigenous Peoples and the Holocaust. PATTERNS OF PREJUDICE 36(4)7-3, by A. Dirk Moses. 2002
The Presumed Exceptionality of the Holocaust Has No Factual Basis. It is Instead Based on Philosophy, Metaphysics, and–Especially–Politics. It is Inherently Divisive, Inconsiderate of All the Other Genocides, and Inevitably the Source of Victimhood Olympics
The author, Anthony Dirk Moses, is a historian and a specialist in genocide. He criticizes Holocaust self-importance. Agree with him or not, but acknowledge that he knows what he is talking about.
Although this academic paper was now written 17 years ago, it remains relevant. While the presumed exceptionality of the Jews’ Holocaust is no longer much discussed in academia, it is still very much tacitly treated, as fact, for purposes of the educational and political policies that govern the western world. Thus, the Holocaust continues to enjoy an over-signification and over-attention that is not remotely true of the genocide of any other people. We are still far, far from Genocide Recognition Equality.
The following include quotes from author Anthony Dirk Moses.
HOLOCAUST SUPREMACISM DISENFRANCHIZES THE GENOCIDES OF NONWHITE PEOPLES–AND NOT ONLY THE GENOCIDES OF NONWHITE PEOPLES. IT DISENFRANCHIZES ALL THE GENOCIDES OF NON-JEWS
“Underlying this asymmetry is the claim that the Holocaust is ‘unique’, ‘unprecedented or ‘singular’‘. Its implications for the study of indigenous genocide are as significant as they are dire: that such ‘lesser’ or ‘incomplete’ genocides–if indeed they are considered genocides at all–are marginal or even ‘primitive’, thereby reinforcing hegemonic Eurocentrism, and that the moral cache of the indigenous survivors of colonialism is less than that of the Jews.” (p. 4).
However, this problem is not limited to the disenfranchisement, by Holocaust supremacism, of the genocides of nonwhite peoples. Last time I checked, Poles are white people. The Nazi German genocide of the Poles (the Polokaust) ALSO is ‘lesser’, ‘incomplete’, and even ‘primitive’, assuming that it is recognized as genocide at all. [We are assured, after all, that “only” 10% of the Polish population was killed. Yes, “only” 10%. What a relief!] Clearly, the problem is not Eurocentrism: The problem is Judeocentrism. There is no escaping the fact that the genocides of non-Jews are not treated with the same seriousness as the Nazi German genocide of the Jews. Does this not border on racism?
HOLOCAUST SUPREMACY, BY ITS VERY NATURE, IS DIVISIVE. WHY SUFFERING OLYMPICS
“Identity politics and academic enquiry are often conflated in polemical expressions of group trauma, and rancor sets the tone. The question almost raises itself: should the victim’s point of view be authoritative in this field when different victim groups make incommensurable, indeed competing, claims?’ (p. 10).
HOLOCAUST EXCEPTIONALISM AND HOLOCAUST UNIQUENESS ARE NOT BASED ON FACTS: THEY DRIVE VICTIMHOOD COMPETITION
“What is more, whether the similarities [between the Shoah and the genocides of non-Jews] are more significant than the differences is ultimately POLITICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL, rather than a historical, question and, as we have seen, the answers are driven by passionate, extra-historical considerations.” (p. 18; Emphasis added).
“Uniqueness is not a useful category for historical research; IT IS A RELIGIOUS OR METAPHYSICAL CATEGORY, and should be left to theologians and philosophers to ponder for their respective reading communities. Where historians employ it, they stand in danger of relinquishing their critical role and assuming that of the prophet or sage who offers perspectives for group solidarity and self-assertion.” (pp. 18-19; Emphasis added).
For more on the fact and consequences of the Holocaust enthroned, see these reviews:
https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/ushmm-orwellian-holocaustspeak-comedy-linenthal/
https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/victimhood-competition-ukes-beat-jews-young/
To see a series of reviews in a Category click on that Category:
- All Reviews
- Celebrate Poland's Heroic Narrative!
- Censorship Of Poles in Favor of Jews
- Communist and Nazi Crimes Equal. Stalin a Twin of Hitler
- Cultural Marxism
- Current Polish-Jewish Relations
- Follies of POLISH CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST RESEARCH
- German Polonocide in WWII
- German Repentance Jewish-Centered
- Holocaust Education Monopoly
- Holocaust Industry Propaganda
- Holocaust Industry Tactics
- Holocaust Myths
- Holocaust Was Not Special
- Holocaust-Centric Narratives Rule
- Ingratitude To Polish Rescuers of Jews
- Interwar Polish-Jewish Relations: Don't Automatically Blame Everything on Poles
- Jedwabne Provocation: German-Made Holocaust Expanded
- Jewish Collaboration With Nazis
- Jewish Economic Dominance
- Jews and Anti-Christian Tendencies
- Jews Antagonize Poland
- Jews Self-Otherize in Poland
- Media, Hollywood Polonophobia
- No "Civil War": Poland Communized By Soviet Russian Force
- No Polish Complicity in the Holocaust
- Persistent Anti-Polish Trends
- Pogroms Demythologized
- Polish Collaboration With Nazis Insignificant
- Polish Guerrilla Warfare
- Polish Nationalism: The Truth
- Polokaust (Polocaust) Long-Term
- Premodern Poland: Little-Known Facts
- Rescue of Danish Jews Demythologized
- Two Sides to Jewish-Goyish Antagonisms
- Ukrainian-Polish Relations
- Understanding Nazis and Jews
- Western European Threat and the European Union
- Zydokomuna in Action
- Zydokomuna in Jewish Life
