Polish-Jewish Relations: 1,300 Keyword-Phrase-Indexed Book Reviews (by Jan Peczkis)

Herzl, by Amos Elon. 1975. Faber and Faber, London

Jews Were  Settler Colonists in Poland. A New Jewish State Could Be In Uganda, So Why Not in Poland? (Read: Judeopolonia). Jewish Germanophilia at Slavic Expense

My review is based on the original 1975 edition. I focus on relevant topics.

JEWISH COLONIALISM WAS UNUSUAL: COLONIALISM WITHOUT A METROPOLE. IMPLICATIONS FOR COLONIZED POLAND

Herzl envisioned a series of colonies of Jews, including one in Uganda. These would serve as national bases and training stations for the repossession of Palestine. Elon comments, (quote) For Jews, everything always was upside down anyway. With all other peoples, colonies were founded by the motherland; in this case the colonies would come first and later establish a motherland. (unquote). (p. 375).

In other words, colonies are normally founded by the metropole (motherland). In the Jewish case, the metropole (eventual Israel) came second, and the colonies (e. g, Uganda) came first. This reasoning can be extended, and we can see the Zionist idea of “national bases and training stations” as just an improvement over the kind of settler colonialism that the Jews had been doing to other nations all along. Let us look at this closely.

The Jews have always been an international people, and so their “metropole” had always been ‘international Jewry”, and, until recently, not some specific geographic motherland. Taken further, and looking at all the centuries, we can see Jews as settler colonists that had dominated and been living off other nations (such as Poland). They had not been dispatched to these colonies by any geographic metropole, but by the “metropole” of international Jewry. These early forms of Jewish colonialism also fit in with the later Bundists who said that international Jewry is a “higher” form of nationalism that does not have to fight it out with other nations over territorial boundaries, as Jewish nationalism (of the Bundist, as opposed to Zionist, variety) is not attached to any specific geographic territory. Rather, it is a “floating” metropole–one that can and does send Jewish settler colonists to any place on Earth in accordance with the Jews’ advantage.

Many Poles were well aware of Jews as settler colonists in Poland. Roman Dmowski contended that Poland was always weak towards the Jews, and for this reason so many Jews took advantage of this, successively coming over to Poland to colonize her. Poland effectively became the Second Land of Canaan.

A JEWISH STATE: IF POTENTIALLY IN UGANDA, WHY NOT POTENTIALLY A JUDEOPOLONIA?

The foregoing has additional implications. Why create a territorial Jewish community, from scratch, in Uganda? What better location to create a Jewish colony than in one in which so many Jews already lived and where there was a huge Jewish infrastructure already in place? Enter foreign-ruled Poland. Not surprisingly, Poles feared a Judeopolonia (a politicized Jewish state-within-a-state on Polish soil)–one that would be an end in itself and/or a step in the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine.

HERZL’S CHANGING VIEWS ON THE SITUATION FACING JEWS

Theodor Herzl was an atheist. (pp. 22-23). His mindset on the Jewish situation changed over time: It went from German nationalism to cosmopolitanism, and from cosmopolitanism to a belief in the Jewish exodus from Europe. (p. 131). Herzl’s vision of the State of Israel was one in which the Arabs would welcome the Jews, and both peoples would live in amity. (p. 407). Instead, precisely the opposite happened.

This book provides a lesson on the important Jewish personages of the time. For instance, Heinrich Graetz is characterized by Amos Elon as a great Jewish historian, and Graetz’ HISTORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE is honored as monumental. (p. 40). For example, see:

https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/jews-not-nobility-exploited-peasants-graetz/

JEWISH GERMANOPHILIA: JEWISH COMPLICITY IN THE GERMANIC OPPRESSION OF THE SLAVIC PEOPLES

Author Elon summarizes the situation of Jews in Herzl’s Austria at the turn of the century, (quote) Many, if not most, Jewish students in Austria were ardent German patriots. If ever a people spontaneously and wholeheartedly entered the service of another, the Jews of Austria did so for the ruling Germans of Austria. Never was an attachment by a minority to a majority so strong; never was it expressed in such magnificent cultural contributions. Austrian middle-class Jews generally supported the so-called Constitutionalist party. The Constitutionalists endorsed the liberal creed of their kin in England and France–laissez-faire, rule of law, freedom of speech, separation of church and state–but they upheld the right of the German-speaking population to rule the vast majority of poor, uncivilized Slavs. The German speakers monopolized power, destined to rule by virtue of their higher culture and superior language; the Slavs were commonly called BEDIENTENVOLKER (servant peoples). (unquote). (p. 53).

A generation or so later, under Nazism, the Jews found themselves on the bottom of the pecking order, slightly below the Slavs. What goes around comes around.

HERZL IN WILNO: INADVERTENT DESCRIPTION OF THE LITVAKS (LITWAKS)

Let us pursue the Jewish state-within-state concept, otherwise known as Jewish nationalism (whether of the Bundist or Zionist variety), a little further:

The author sets the stage for this visit to Wilno, (quote) Vilna [Wilno, Vilnius] was a center of revolutionary activity, a stronghold of the clandestine BUND of Jewish Workers, which was aligned with Lenin’s Social Democratic party. Vilna was also a citadel of left-wing Zionist activity. The Zionists and the BUND had in fact grown intertwined within the history of Russian radicalism. If many of the Zionists were left-wing socialists, the BUND affirmed Jewish nationhood, but within Russia proper. (Plekhanov called the Bundists “Zionists afraid of a sea voyage.”). (unquote). (pp. 382-383).

Although not written for this purpose, the attitudes of the Litvaks (Litwaks) were instructive. They make it easy to see why Poles resented the influx of Litvaks into Congress Poland (Russian-ruled central Poland), and why the more tradition-minded and Poland-friendly Jews of Congress Poland did also.

Some pioneering Zionists were strongly anti-assimilationist–for example, Max Nordau:

https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2019/11/04/antiassimilationist-jewish-advocacy-nordau/

RECONCILING COMMUNISM AND ZIONISM

Ber Borochov is most remembered for attempting a synthesis of Marxism and Zionism. While Elon does not mention Borochov, he makes it clear that Herzl also attempted a synthesis–or rather prioritization–of the two movements. Elon comments, (quote) Herzl asked his audience to concentrate on Zionist agitation rather than on Jewish culture within Russia itself, and to thereby avoid Russian suspicions. He warned also against Jewish involvement in socialist activities. This, he intimated, was putting the cart before the horse. “In Palestine, in our own land, an extreme Socialist party will be perfectly in order,” he said. “Once we are in our land such a party would vitalize our political life–and then I shall determine my own attitude toward it.” (unquote)(pp. 381-382). [Semantics aside, how is “extreme Socialist” different from Communist?]

IMPACT OF ZIONISM

Many leading Jewish thinkers of the time were skeptical of Herzl’s efforts, for one reason or another. For instance, Asher Ginzberg (Ahad Haam), described by author Amos Elon as one of the most influential Jewish thinkers in Eastern Europe, criticized Herzl for his cosmopolitan outlook, and the lack of specific Jewish content in Herzl’s movement. (p. 350).

The author quantifies the spectacular growth of Jewish interest in Zionism after the First Zionist Congress. For instance, there were an astonishing 913 Jewish Zionist clubs and organizations, from all over the world, already present at the Second Zionist Congress. (p. 258).

THE REACTION FROM WEALTHY JEWS. THE ROTHSCHILDS IN THE CROSSHAIRS

Not surprisingly, Herzl sought the support from wealthy and influential Jews. For example, (quote) He [Herzl] received Israel Poznanski, owner of huge textile mills in Lodz, said to be the richest Jew in Poland and a notorious exploiter of child labor. (unquote). (p. 253). Herzl also sought the support of wealthy gentiles.

Edmond de Rothschild had funded Jewish colonies in Palestine but, according to Elon, his actions were of a philanthropic nature, and Rothschild was not a Zionist. (p. 209). Theodor Herzl found the Rothschilds’ wealth repulsive, and would continue to do so even if these bankers eventually supported his Zionist venture, (quote) He [Herzl] warned the Rothschilds not to expect great riches in the new state. The Rothschilds’ alarming concentration of wealth would not be tolerated even “if you go with us.” (unquote). (p. 148). This is interesting, as it is usually supposed that only anti-Semites are concerned about “Jewish greed”.

Amazingly, Herzl voiced the kind of invective against the Rothschilds that one might expect from a Jewish-bankers conspiracy theorist! Theodor Herzl had suspected that the House of Rothschild was acting against him, prompting this reaction described by Elon, (quote) He [Herzl] worked himself up into a veritable Rothschild phobia. They were mean “scoundrels and malefactors… Sooner or later,” he wrote on September 23, “I shall have to start a campaign against the Rothschilds…the world menace that this octopus constitutes.” In a public statement he threatened the Rothschilds with the international boycott of the Jewish middle classes. (unquote). (p. 251).